2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.103968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Modelling of Borehole-Surface CSEM Response of Onshore Gas Hydrate Deposit with Higher Order Finite Difference Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, the CSEM has become more and more popular in many different application scenarios due to its ability to display conductivity contrasts with respect to their surrounding sediments (e.g., detecting resistive zones in a conductive background). As a result, nowadays CSEM has real application in many contexts such as hydrocarbon exploration [1]- [10], reservoir monitoring [11], [12], CO 2 storage characterization [13]- [18], and geothermal reservoir imaging [19]- [22], among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, the CSEM has become more and more popular in many different application scenarios due to its ability to display conductivity contrasts with respect to their surrounding sediments (e.g., detecting resistive zones in a conductive background). As a result, nowadays CSEM has real application in many contexts such as hydrocarbon exploration [1]- [10], reservoir monitoring [11], [12], CO 2 storage characterization [13]- [18], and geothermal reservoir imaging [19]- [22], among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since EM methods can display resistivity/conductivity variations concerning their surrounding materials, EM imaging has greatly complemented seismic methods (sensitive to subsurface structure). As a result, EM imaging technologies have been applied in different areas of geophysics such as off-shore hydrocarbon (Newman and Alumbaugh, 1997;Eidesmo et al, 2002;Avdeev, 2005;Constable, 2006;Srnka et al, 2006;Orange et al, 2009;Constable, 2010;Wirianto et al, 2010;Castillo-Reyes et al, 2018;Castillo-Reyes et al, 2019;Castillo-Reyes et al, 2022b), mineral and resource mining (Sheard et al, 2005;Yang and Oldenburg, 2012), crustal conductivity studies (Hördt et al, 1992;Hördt et al, 2000), CO 2 storage characterization (Chen et al, 2007;Girard et al, 2011;Vilamajó et al, 2013;Zhdanov et al, 2013;Vilamajó et al, 2016;Park et al, 2017;Tveit et al, 2020), geothermal reservoir imaging (Kana et al, 2015;Coppo et al, 2016;Darnet et al, 2018;Omisore et al, 2020;Castillo-Reyes et al, 2021), and water prospecting (Palacky et al, 1981;McNeill, 1990;Nabighian and Macnae, 1991;Palacky, 1993;Nobes, 1996;Chang et al, 2019). Regardless of the application context, the authors stand out on the potential of EM methods for exploration, appraisal, and soil characterization.…”
Section: Electromagnetic Data For Enhanced Imaging Of the Earthmentioning
confidence: 99%