2018
DOI: 10.14311/app.2018.18.0038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Modelling of Compressive Characteristics of Auxetic Structures

Abstract: The paper is focused on numerical analysis of mechanical behaviour of auxetic structures with re-entrant tetrakaidecahedral unit cell subjected to uni-axial quasi-static compression. The mechanical behaviour was evaluated inversely with respect to selected geometrical parameters of the unit cell and two different loading modes. Finite element method was used for the numerical analysis of the problem. A set of fully parametric tools has been developed, which enabled automated execution and evaluation of virtual… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To achieve the auxetic design of the cell, the re-entrant angle as defined by Choi and Lakes [28] may vary in the range 45-90 • . Based on a prior numerical analysis [29] two versions of the unit-cell geometry, both with a re-entrant angle of 60 • , were considered in this study. The "beam" version is based on the original open-cell design and consists only of struts, while the "facet" version is designed as an assumed stiffer modification of the original cell consisting of both 1D (struts) and 2D (facets) elements.…”
Section: Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To achieve the auxetic design of the cell, the re-entrant angle as defined by Choi and Lakes [28] may vary in the range 45-90 • . Based on a prior numerical analysis [29] two versions of the unit-cell geometry, both with a re-entrant angle of 60 • , were considered in this study. The "beam" version is based on the original open-cell design and consists only of struts, while the "facet" version is designed as an assumed stiffer modification of the original cell consisting of both 1D (struts) and 2D (facets) elements.…”
Section: Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this property was not evaluated in this study due to the geometry of the investigated specimens. Firstly, due to the restrictions resulting from the geometry of the dynamic experimental setup and the limited precision of the manufacturing method, the number of unit cells did not fulfil the requirements on the representative volume element (RVE) of the structure [29]. Thus, the deformation localisation exerted a strong effect on the overall response of the specimens.…”
Section: Auxeticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mechanical behavior was evaluated inversely with respect to selected geometrical parameters of the unit cell and two different loading modes. Finite element method was used for the numerical analysis of the problem, and from results of simulations, Young’s modulus, the characteristics of Poisson’s ratio function, and deformation energy density were estimated [ 22 ]. Patiballa and Krishnan [ 23 ] presented a new mechanics-based framework for the qualitative analysis and conceptual design of mechanical metamaterials, and specifically materials exhibiting auxetic behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%