2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2014.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modelling of load bearing light gauge steel frame wall systems exposed to realistic design fires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The developed finite element models were able to predict the stud failure times (FRR) within 5 min as shown in Table 1. Details of these fire tests and numerical studies of LSF walls exposed to realistic design fire curves are given in [24,25]. Despite the successful outcomes, fire tests in this study showed the practical difficulties of using realistic design fire time-temperature curves for conventional fire tests, in particular rapid fire curves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The developed finite element models were able to predict the stud failure times (FRR) within 5 min as shown in Table 1. Details of these fire tests and numerical studies of LSF walls exposed to realistic design fire curves are given in [24,25]. Despite the successful outcomes, fire tests in this study showed the practical difficulties of using realistic design fire time-temperature curves for conventional fire tests, in particular rapid fire curves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Ariyanayagam and Mahendran's fire tests and finite element analysis (FEA) [24,25] were limited to the three LSF wall configurations and six realistic design fire curves. Hence there is a need to extend this research using a detailed parametric study using validated finite element models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…increase the FRLs). These strategies were experimentally and numerically evaluated by incorporating different stud sections (Kesawan and Mahendran, 2015), adding more plasterboard layers (Sultan and Kodur, 2000), changing the type of wall boards from conventionally used gypsum plasterboards to MgO boards and calcium silicate boards (Chen et al, 2012), using enhanced plasterboards by additives and fillers (Keerthan and Mahendran, 2013), including external or sandwiched insulation between two plasterboards (Kolarkar 2010), including different insulation materials with varying thickness and materials such as rock, glass, and cellulose fibre insulation materials (Gunalan, 2011) and evaluating the difference between realistic and standard fire curves (Ariyanayagam, 2013). Measured data from experimental investigations need to be evaluated with the use of numerical analysis results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basically, it became an integral part of the fire resistance assessment process of building materials, constructions or their parts, serving as an effective tool for the prediction of their behavior when exposed to fire [1]- [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%