2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2009.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modelling of square tubular steel beams subjected to transverse blast loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently three commercial numerical codes, namely, ABAQUS, LS-DYNA and AUTODYN have been used extensively in the modeling of blast-loaded structures [15][16][17]. Numerous attempts have been made using commercially available software packages to model the large inelastic deformation or complete failure of the structure subjected to blast loading [18][19][20][21][22]. These simulations have compared well with the experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently three commercial numerical codes, namely, ABAQUS, LS-DYNA and AUTODYN have been used extensively in the modeling of blast-loaded structures [15][16][17]. Numerous attempts have been made using commercially available software packages to model the large inelastic deformation or complete failure of the structure subjected to blast loading [18][19][20][21][22]. These simulations have compared well with the experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed model can describe the temporal variation of local and global deformations when the strain rate effects are taken into account during both phases of deformation. Such model has been validated using the results published by Jama et al [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest numerical approximations of blast loads are triangular, rectangular, or bilinear pressure-time curves, more often used in the past but also at present (Biggs (1964), Jama et al (2009), Krauthammer and Ku (1996), Louca et al (1996), Tavakoli and Kiakojouri (2014)), and in analytical methods (Biggs (1964), Jones (1997), Smith and Hetherington (1994)). More precise, build-in numerical representation of blast loads appeared when Randers-Pehrson and Bannister (1997) implemented previous work of Kingery and Bulmash (1984) (ConWep blast model Bruce and Jon (1991)) in LS-DYNA (LSTC (2013a, b)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%