2015
DOI: 10.1177/1099636215576475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modelling of the compression-after-impact performance of a composite sandwich panel

Abstract: A numerical model for the quasi-static indentation and compression-after-impact behaviour of a composite sandwich panel is presented, using cohesive surfaces for inter-laminar damage prediction. Intra-laminar damage and core crushing is also included. The models show generally good agreement with experimental results for residual strength, performing best when two cohesive surfaces are used in the impacted skin, but tend to over-estimate the undamaged panel strength. Damage extent predictions from the indentat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result of the compressive nature of loading experienced by the cylinders, it was expected that SLIMC1 and SLIMC2 would be the most influential parameters among all stress limit factors. Correspondingly, values of SLIMT1, SLIMT2, and SLIMS were chosen based on the software developer's recommendations provided in [15], whereas the values of SLIMC1 and SLIMC2 were obtained from the range of 0.1-1.0 via calibration with experimental data, as will be discussed in Section 5.2. The upper bound of this range (SLIMC1 = SLIMC2 = 1.0) corresponds to the developer's recommendation.…”
Section: Slimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a result of the compressive nature of loading experienced by the cylinders, it was expected that SLIMC1 and SLIMC2 would be the most influential parameters among all stress limit factors. Correspondingly, values of SLIMT1, SLIMT2, and SLIMS were chosen based on the software developer's recommendations provided in [15], whereas the values of SLIMC1 and SLIMC2 were obtained from the range of 0.1-1.0 via calibration with experimental data, as will be discussed in Section 5.2. The upper bound of this range (SLIMC1 = SLIMC2 = 1.0) corresponds to the developer's recommendation.…”
Section: Slimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particular value from the specified range was chosen via calibration with experimental data, as will be discussed in Section 5. In addition, the condition for CN > CNmin must be ensured (see [15]), where CN min = (1/2) × (NFLS 2 )/(G_Ic). This condition is satisfied for the listed set of parameters of the delamination model.…”
Section: Property Value or Range Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analytical models were also proposed to simulate the initiation and propagation of impact damages [13][14][15]. In addition, finite element models with complex structural details were used to study the impact damage resistance as well as damage tolerance of composite sandwich structures [16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%