2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2018.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modelling of the flow and bed evolution of a single bore-driven swash event on a coarse sand beach

Abstract: This paper examines the numerical prediction of the sediment transport and bed evolution for a single swash event on a coarse sediment beach. In these conditions bed load is the dominant mode of sediment transport. Laboratory experiments of a single bore-driven swash event are simulated numerically using a fully-coupled model that solves the system of Non Linear Shallow Water Equations and the Exner sediment conservation formula. The analysis focuses on two aspects: the optimal choice of parameters for the Mey… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relatively simple unsteady Bottom Boundary Layer (BBL) models, such as the momentum integral method (Sumer et al 1987) used also in NLSWE solvers (e.g., Briganti et al 2011), could be considered. However, the results in terms of τ b are comparable with simpler formulations, such as the one considered in this study (see e.g., Briganti et al 2018). Also, phase differences could be significant and more complex BBL models should be used (e.g., Rijnsdorp et al 2017).…”
Section: Hydrodynamicssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relatively simple unsteady Bottom Boundary Layer (BBL) models, such as the momentum integral method (Sumer et al 1987) used also in NLSWE solvers (e.g., Briganti et al 2011), could be considered. However, the results in terms of τ b are comparable with simpler formulations, such as the one considered in this study (see e.g., Briganti et al 2018). Also, phase differences could be significant and more complex BBL models should be used (e.g., Rijnsdorp et al 2017).…”
Section: Hydrodynamicssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The Meyer-Peter and Müller (1948) formula is considered appropriate for the swash zone according to previous studies (see Chardón-Maldonado et al 2016 among others) and variations of the formula have been tested, for example in Postacchini et al (2012) for sand and Briganti et al (2018) for coarse sand. When compared with the original Meyer-Peter and Müller (1948) formula, the Postacchini et al (2012) formulation showed very similar results in terms of net bed changes (see Briganti et al 2016).…”
Section: Intra-wave Sediment Transport Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High quality field and numerical investigations are providing new insights into a wide variety of coastal processes and coastal protection solutions 1 , 2 . However, numerical modelling approaches are not yet capable of accurately reproducing all coastal hydro and morphodynamic phenomena, and the difficulties involved in capturing field data in the desired wave, tide and wind conditions mean that controlled laboratory wave flume experiments remain extremely valuable.…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C w is the wave celerity taken as the velocity of the bore ( C b , Hansen & Svendsen, 1987), estimated by Svendsen et al (1978) as Cb20.25em=0.25emitalicghdcdth3)(dc+dt2, with d c being the water depth at the bore crest and d t the water depth at the trough. The bed shear stress is computed with a Chézy‐type formula (Equation 14, Jonsson, 1966), with f b a friction coefficient for oscillatory flows computed with Equation 15, the Colebrook formula (Briganti et al, 2018; O'Donoghue et al, 2016). τb0.25em=0.25em12fbρU2, 0.5fb0.25em=0.25em2log10)(ks14.9h+2.51italicRe2fb, where Re = u w h / ν is the Reynolds number for instantaneous depth and velocity, with ν being the water kinematic viscosity (m 2 /s).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%