2016
DOI: 10.1680/jgeot.15.p.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modelling of transient cyclic vertical loading of suction caissons in sand

Abstract: This paper presents numerical investigations of the monotonic and cyclic behaviours of suction caissons upon vertical transient loading. Both drained and partially drained conditions are investigated. Monotonic compression and traction simulations are carried out to qualitatively compare results with the literature and validate the model. They highlight the different modes of reaction of the caisson to both compression and traction loading. A sensitivity analysis points out the strong influence of some paramet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of c 12 in the literature vary significantly depending on the type of soils and problems investigated. For example, Cerfontaine et al 28 used 1 m/(kPa•s) for sand, while Hu et al 29 used 1.28 ×10 −10 m/(kPa•s) for leachate flow in waste fills. In the following simulation, a value of c 12 = 1×10 −9 m/(kPa•s) was adopted by calibrating against the tests in Figure 1.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Interface Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values of c 12 in the literature vary significantly depending on the type of soils and problems investigated. For example, Cerfontaine et al 28 used 1 m/(kPa•s) for sand, while Hu et al 29 used 1.28 ×10 −10 m/(kPa•s) for leachate flow in waste fills. In the following simulation, a value of c 12 = 1×10 −9 m/(kPa•s) was adopted by calibrating against the tests in Figure 1.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Interface Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of c 12 in the literature vary significantly depending on the type of soils and problems investigated. For example, Cerfontaine et al 28 . used 1 m/(kPa∙s) for sand, while Hu et al 29 .…”
Section: Discussion Of the Interface Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is validated against results published in the literature for three different materials. Contrary to rock materials, different models exist for the cyclic behaviour of sands such as the Prevost model (Prevost, 1985;Cerfontaine et al, 2015), generalised plasticity (Mira et al, 2009) or subloading surface (Hashiguchi, 2009). The formulation proposed hereinafter is based on the bounding surface plasticity (Dafalias, 1986), the pioneering work on its application in form a two surface plasticity model for sands (Manzari & Dafalias, 1997) which was later extended further (Dafalias & Manzari, 2004;Taiebat & Dafalias, 2008;Li & Dafalias, 2012;Dafalias & Taiebat, 2016) and adopted the title of SANISAND, an acronym term for Simple ANIsotropic SAND.…”
Section: List Of Symbols αmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Thieken et al [38] presented numerical simulations of a suction caisson, focusing on coupled pore fluid diffusion under fluctuating tension conditions in sandy terrain. Shortly thereafter, Cerfontaine et al [39] applied the Prevost elastic-plastic model to explore the monotonic and cyclic behaviors of suction caissons under vertical transient loading. Shen et al [40] proposed a numerical model to predict the oscillation and accumulations of pore pressures around the suction anchor under the influence of long-term vertical cyclic load variations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%