2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical models for the study of the nonlinear frequency mixing in two and three-dimensional resonant cavities filled with a bubbly liquid

Abstract: The objective of this work is to develop versatile numerical models to study the nonlinear distortion of ultrasounds and the generation of low-ultrasonic frequency signals by nonlinear frequency mixing in two and three-dimensional resonators filled with bubbly liquids. The interaction of the acoustic field and the bubble vibrations is modeled through a coupled differential system formed by the multi-dimensional wave equation and a Rayleigh-Plesset equation. The numerical models we develop are based on multi-di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the numerical model in the above references did not allow to get the same geometrical shape at the source, this comparison led to a quite good concordance. With the single-frequency source, the maximal pressure amplitude at 2f with the model from [30] was 40% of the fundamental frequency amplitude f, whereas it is 46% here. In the case of the dual-frequency source, the maximal pressure amplitude at f d with the model from [31] was 5% of the pressure amplitude at the primary frequency f 1 , whereas it is 6% with the current model presented here.…”
Section: Dual-frequency Sourcementioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the numerical model in the above references did not allow to get the same geometrical shape at the source, this comparison led to a quite good concordance. With the single-frequency source, the maximal pressure amplitude at 2f with the model from [30] was 40% of the fundamental frequency amplitude f, whereas it is 46% here. In the case of the dual-frequency source, the maximal pressure amplitude at f d with the model from [31] was 5% of the pressure amplitude at the primary frequency f 1 , whereas it is 6% with the current model presented here.…”
Section: Dual-frequency Sourcementioning
confidence: 72%
“…It must be noted here that to verify and validate the numerical model presented in this paper, it was used with the parameters given in Sections 3.1 and 3.2 and compared with another model based on a diferent kind of numerical methods, published earlier in the literature [30,31]. Although the numerical model in the above references did not allow to get the same geometrical shape at the source, this comparison led to a quite good concordance.…”
Section: Dual-frequency Sourcementioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section we consider our problem in a two-dimensional domain of dimensions L x × L y . The following partial differential equations system is considered [2,4,5,28], in which the acoustic pressure is p(x, y, t) and the bubble volume variation is v(x, y, t) = V(x, y, t) − v 0g , where (x, y) are the two-dimensional space coordinates and V(x, y, t) is the instantaneous bubble volume located at position (x, y). Subscripts t, x, and y stand for partial derivatives with respect to t, x, and y:…”
Section: Two-dimensional Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control of the numerous parameters which come into play in the set-up of experimental systems to study the behavior of finite-amplitude ultrasound propagating in liquids with a stable population of gas bubbles is a very difficult task. The development of numerical models able to approximate the nonlinear response of such systems is thus necessary to analyze the generation of harmonics, difference and sum frequencies during the propagation of finite-amplitude acoustic waves in bubbly liquids [19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%