2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12678-021-00668-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Optimization of Electrodeposition Thickness Uniformity with Respect to the Layout of Anode and Cathode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As other have previously noted, film thickness is heavily affected by hydrodynamics (i.e. stirring/bath geometry) and cathode placement 24 , 25 , though the majority of our films were ≥ 100 µm. The 96-h electroplated samples had more consistent thicknesses with DC-plating yielding thicker films than pulsed-plating, likely due to the lower effective current (i.e.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…As other have previously noted, film thickness is heavily affected by hydrodynamics (i.e. stirring/bath geometry) and cathode placement 24 , 25 , though the majority of our films were ≥ 100 µm. The 96-h electroplated samples had more consistent thicknesses with DC-plating yielding thicker films than pulsed-plating, likely due to the lower effective current (i.e.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Initial PbO 2 thicknesses were on the same order of magnitude while still being impacted according to the different substrates used and their individual resistivity. We can note that the PK1 layer is very inhomogeneous and detect large differences between the top and bottom of the sample, indicating a probable effect of the electrodeposition process (usually, for electrodeposited layers, the edge part is thicker and the center part near the liquid surface is thinner). The PK2 layers are however much more homogeneous.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Owing to the electric current detour around the cathode [ 42 ], the current density at the edge was higher than that in the middle. According to Faraday’s law, the uniformity of the deposition thickness is determined by the current density, and thus, a relatively high current density leads to greater changes in the coating thickness [ 28 , 43 ]. Figure 4 b compares the differences between the simulation and the experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Faraday’s law [ 28 ], the thickness of the coating is calculated by [ 36 ] where is the molar mass and is the density.…”
Section: Modelling Of the Electrodepositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation