2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical pathologies in snap-through simulations

Abstract: Aircraft structures operating in severe environments may experience snap-through, causing the curvature on part or all of the structure to invert inducing fatigue damage. This paper examines the performance of beam and continuum nonlinear finite element formulations in conjunction with several popular implicit time stepping algorithms to assess the accuracy and stability of numerical simulations of snap-through events. Limitations for the structural elements are identified and we provide examples of interactio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 shows the solutions of Beams 1 and 2 obtained with ∆t = 10 −3 s and ∆t = 2 × 10 −4 s, respectively. These time steps are chosen such that the true solution is obtained [19,17,18]. The figure shows that the systems oscillate about their snapped configuration starting immediately after the snap-through event; the amplitude of the oscillations decreases over the time interval where the load continues to ramp up, but then remains constant when the external load is constant.…”
Section: Curved Archesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…6 shows the solutions of Beams 1 and 2 obtained with ∆t = 10 −3 s and ∆t = 2 × 10 −4 s, respectively. These time steps are chosen such that the true solution is obtained [19,17,18]. The figure shows that the systems oscillate about their snapped configuration starting immediately after the snap-through event; the amplitude of the oscillations decreases over the time interval where the load continues to ramp up, but then remains constant when the external load is constant.…”
Section: Curved Archesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beam elements utilized are beam elements without shear deformation with large displacement and small rotation (2 nd order theory) with cubic interpolation [43]. A study on the performance of other elements (2D beam element with shear deformation, 3D linear displacement formulation, B-bar, and enhanced formulations, and 3D quadratic element) is presented in [19,17].…”
Section: Curved Archesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Beam and shell models, usually the most computationally efficient choice for finite element modeling of thin structural members, always involve some simplifications of the underlying threedimensional kinematics that can lead to artificial stiffness under particular load states (locking). These kinematic assumptions that are built into the formulation of structural elements can lead to inaccurate solutions [20]. In this work we avoid such issues as well as the locking sometimes present when linear elements are used by choosing to work with three-dimensional (solid) quadratic elements only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the approach that is also taken in this paper. A different approach is usually based on non-linear finite element modelling [3,4,5]. A disadvantage of this procedure is that it requires the magnitude of independent parameters defined in the problem to be constant along the analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%