2020
DOI: 10.37934/cfdl.12.6.118133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Performance Study for the Buoy Shape of Point Absorber Wave Energy Converters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, these results are analyzed using MathCAD software. Both of this research [84], [104] discuss hydrodynamic buoyancy studies. This research is considered partial and preliminary WEC system development.…”
Section: A Wec Projects and Device Developmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then, these results are analyzed using MathCAD software. Both of this research [84], [104] discuss hydrodynamic buoyancy studies. This research is considered partial and preliminary WEC system development.…”
Section: A Wec Projects and Device Developmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Nevertheless, research on WEC device development in Malaysia is still at an early stage. Several simulation models [22], [38], [82]- [86], [104], lab sized WEC devices [89], [105] and small scale prototype [88], [106], [107] are included in this study.…”
Section: A Wec Projects and Device Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, two-step algorithms are more robust compared with three-step or four step methods in computation of wave equation, and it is possible to be extended further for various applications related to wave fluctuations [67,68].…”
Section: Average Numerical Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five numerical models constructed using FLOW‐3D were analyzed. Additionally, the optimal phase condition of buoys was achieved by varying the radius and mass density 21 . The natural period and maximum capture width ratio were obtained through a water‐tank test with a small‐scale model 22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%