2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-06805-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical prediction of machining-induced surface residual stress for TC4 cryogenic turning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average Shore hardness A of five welded parts is about SH 82, SH 83, SH 81, SH 83, and SH 82, respectively. This study utilizes a CNC turning machine [34][35][36] to weld PEEK polymer rods. The advantage of this approach is that it is suitable to join large or thicker parts compared with UW [24][25][26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average Shore hardness A of five welded parts is about SH 82, SH 83, SH 81, SH 83, and SH 82, respectively. This study utilizes a CNC turning machine [34][35][36] to weld PEEK polymer rods. The advantage of this approach is that it is suitable to join large or thicker parts compared with UW [24][25][26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation software [41,42] is also recommended to predict the optimum process parameters of RFW, such as the rotational speed, feed rate, axial pressure, welding time, or friction time. In addition, integrating RFW with automation and robotics systems [43] is also a promising research topic because it could enhance the pro- This study utilizes a CNC turning machine [34][35][36] to weld PEEK polymer rods. The advantage of this approach is that it is suitable to join large or thicker parts compared with UW [24][25][26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guo et al [17] established a meshless 3D milling simulation model of TC4 titanium alloy by using the smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method to simulate the cutting forces with different cutting parameters and found that the cutting force is the most sensitive to the axial depth of cut, followed by the radial depth of cut, and it is least sensitive to the feed per tooth value. Liu et al [18] established a finite element model (FEM) for numerical prediction of TC4 turning and analyzed the effect of LN2 low-temperature machining on residual stress distribution, and the results showed that LN2 cryogenic machining can effectively reduce residual tensile stresses, and the study provided some reference for future numerical prediction and suppression of residual stresses. Hu et al [19] investigated the kinematics and material removal mechanisms of longitudinal bending hybrid ultrasonic vibration-assisted milling (LBVAM) through analytical studies, 3D finite element simulations, and corresponding experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%