2018
DOI: 10.1080/19942060.2018.1451389
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical prediction of shock/boundary-layer interactions at high Mach numbers using a modified Spalart–Allmaras model

Abstract: The Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations with one-equation turbulence models are used to simulate the flow field past a cone-flare geometry in the Mach number range from 5 to 8 with emphasis on the interaction region of the flare shock with the upstream boundary layer. A model based on the physics of shock unsteadiness is used to correct the standard Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model to improve the prediction of the extent of the separation bubble arising from the shock/turbulent boundary-layer interactio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high-velocity exhaust gas impingement on the flame deflector is calculated by the realizable k-ε turbulence model, which is suitable for the flow field near the wall (Ali et al, 2018;El-Amin et al, 2010). The transport equations for turbulence kinetic energy (k) and its rate of dissipation (ε) are given as…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high-velocity exhaust gas impingement on the flame deflector is calculated by the realizable k-ε turbulence model, which is suitable for the flow field near the wall (Ali et al, 2018;El-Amin et al, 2010). The transport equations for turbulence kinetic energy (k) and its rate of dissipation (ε) are given as…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The code has been used and validated in several supersonic and hypersonic shock/boundarylayer interaction flows. [19][20][21] The number of grid points is increased in both the streamwise and normal directions from 900 3 300 to 1300 3 500 until the solution is independent of the grid as shown in Figure 2. Therefore, based on the grid convergence study, there is a less than 1% difference between 1300 3 500 and 1100 3 400 grids.…”
Section: Numerical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our efforts to optimize the model, it is obviously time consuming to perform a great deal of CFD simulations, one way to overcome that is to simplify the grid model and use some advanced turbulence model like modified Spalart-Allmaras model (Pasha, Juhany, & Khalid, 2018) to predict the boundary-layer interactions. Also, it can be solved by an alternative better performed method than the calculation of the CFD tools Fotovatikhah et al, 2018).…”
Section: Optimization Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%