2017
DOI: 10.2495/cmem-v6-n2-358-372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical rebuilding of dynamic instabilities and forces in multiphase pipe bend flow

Abstract: The present paper focusses on the numerical rebuilding of different multiphase flow regimes in a medium scale pipe system (6 inch). Principal investigations are performed by CFD to initiate hydrodynamic instabilities and develop them into the correct flow pattern (slug, stratified, etc.) at a given downwind position without applying artificial models or boundary conditions. The numerical predictions of the flow obtained by a volume of fluid CFD method (OpenFoam) are compared with available experimental data. N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to what was discussed by Nakamura et al (1995), the impact by liquid slugs cannot be neglected. It should be noted that Mack et al (2018) validated the experimental work described by Belfroid et al (2016) and confirmed the conclusions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Similar to what was discussed by Nakamura et al (1995), the impact by liquid slugs cannot be neglected. It should be noted that Mack et al (2018) validated the experimental work described by Belfroid et al (2016) and confirmed the conclusions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…A study with OpenFoam by [7] predicted instantaneous component of forces on a bend that were well within the range of the experimental data. The shape of the power spectral density P SD of the forces was also in agreement with measurements.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…The resultantes forces obtained here are one to two orders higher in magnitude than the maximum forces obtained with P F M model presented in [5]. The actual resultants are however well in the same range as the forces measured and predicted in [7]. Nevertheless, a criterion based solely on the liquid hold-up threshold has proved to be insufficient to distinguish forces due to slug impacts from those due to liquid films and waves.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…The conservatism in the bend-force estimation can be reduced by Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. Pontaza (2014), Pontaza et al (2017) and Mack et al (2018) presented accurate results of CFD calculations, but they also mentioned the extensive computational time required which limits the use of CFD in design and optimization. Hossain et al (2019) used CFD to calculate flow quantities as liquid holdup, pressure, and average velocity, to solve a force balance over a pipe bend.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%