2012
DOI: 10.1080/18756891.2012.747653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical representability of fuzzy total preorders

Abstract: We introduce the concept of a fuzzy total preorder. Then we analyze its numerical representability through a real-valued order-preserving function defined for each α-cut.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the first three chapters of [9], or else [4]. There are also other alternative numerical representations for total preorders as well as for other particular kinds of orderings defined on a universe (see Definition 4.2. below, and [2,8,11]). As a matter of fact, some of those alternative representations lean on different kinds of fuzzy numbers (see [10,12]).…”
Section: Total Preordersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…the first three chapters of [9], or else [4]. There are also other alternative numerical representations for total preorders as well as for other particular kinds of orderings defined on a universe (see Definition 4.2. below, and [2,8,11]). As a matter of fact, some of those alternative representations lean on different kinds of fuzzy numbers (see [10,12]).…”
Section: Total Preordersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Furthermore, the fact of existence of different non-equivalent kinds of transitivity definitions and connectedness as well as completeness (see also [27][28][29][30]), tells us that the consideration in the fuzzy context of some kind of fuzzy total preorder is not unique. (Other non-equivalent definitions of transitivity have been introduced in this literature, see e.g., [27,28,31,32]).…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following [2], we pay now attention to the possibility of defining comparisons or preferences that are fuzzy instead of crisp. Suppose that we consider different kinds of orderings on a nonempty set X.…”
Section: Utility Theory In the Fuzzy Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To put an example, one may say that a fuzzy relation F on a universe U is reflexive if F (t, t) = 1 holds for every t ∈ U . However, definitions such as asymmetry, transitivity, etc., as well as certain operations such as intersections, unions, complements, etc., depend on the choice of a suitable triangular norm (see [2]) for details). In fact, there are equivalent definitions of such concepts in the crisp setting (working with classical sets, that is, non-fuzzy), that, when extended to the fuzzy approach, are no longer equivalent, and give rise to many possible different theories and approaches, depending on the definitions considered in each fuzzy context.…”
Section: Utility Theory In the Fuzzy Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%