2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical representation and cross-cut role assignments: Majority members’ responses under cooperative interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When cooperation is introduced among multiple groups, it may increase the unity between the groups and the attractiveness of outgroup members. 19,20 In a laboratory study, when two groups initiated intergroup contact and cooperated, group members were more likely to report reduced bias when they were prompted to think of the new group as comprising one group rather than two. 19 As research in the area of multiple identities developed, so too did the conditions under which contact was understood to reduce bias.…”
Section: Common Ingroup Identity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When cooperation is introduced among multiple groups, it may increase the unity between the groups and the attractiveness of outgroup members. 19,20 In a laboratory study, when two groups initiated intergroup contact and cooperated, group members were more likely to report reduced bias when they were prompted to think of the new group as comprising one group rather than two. 19 As research in the area of multiple identities developed, so too did the conditions under which contact was understood to reduce bias.…”
Section: Common Ingroup Identity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The popularity of this approach is due to its connection with functional leadership theory, which states that leaders should provide teams with structural components (e.g., task roles) to improve team performance (Hackman, 2002). Assigning members different roles for performing a team task offers a new basis for differentiation, lowering previous subgroup salience and intergroup bias (Bettencourt, Molix, Talley, & Eubanks, 2007). By crosscutting task roles, social categorization becomes more complex, more possibilities for subgroup identification are created, and the distinction between in-subgroup and out-subgroup decreases, and therefore completely homogeneous subgroups, clear subgroup boundaries, and their corresponding biases are less likely to occur (Marcus-Newhall, Miller, Holtz, & Brewer, 1993).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, our findings also emphasize that managers need to focus on the team as an interrelated system when monitoring team communication behavior and team performance. For example, managers could define different roles within a team; especially in teams with strong demographic faultlines (e.g., Bettencourt, Molix, Talley, & Eubanks, 2007; T. Driskell, J. E. Driskell, Burke, & Salas, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%