1997
DOI: 10.2307/3546526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Responses of Coyotes and Lynx to the Snowshoe Hare Cycle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
188
3
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 232 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
188
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A5.2), also suggested a pattern whereby only the most abundant species displayed significant cyclical dynamics, apparently driven by the tracking of hare fluctuations. These results are in agreement with previous studies suggesting that coyotes can be strongly dependent on snowshoe hares, at least during cyclic highs (Todd et al 1981, O'Donoghue et al 1997, 1998, and further suggest that coyotes may limit the numerical tracking of hare by lynx through exploitation or interference competition. We emphasize that statistical support for this hypothesis is limited, and that further tests are necessary to robustly test its predictions.…”
Section: -Province-level Studysupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A5.2), also suggested a pattern whereby only the most abundant species displayed significant cyclical dynamics, apparently driven by the tracking of hare fluctuations. These results are in agreement with previous studies suggesting that coyotes can be strongly dependent on snowshoe hares, at least during cyclic highs (Todd et al 1981, O'Donoghue et al 1997, 1998, and further suggest that coyotes may limit the numerical tracking of hare by lynx through exploitation or interference competition. We emphasize that statistical support for this hypothesis is limited, and that further tests are necessary to robustly test its predictions.…”
Section: -Province-level Studysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The coyote is a more generalized feeder compared to lynx (e.g., Litvaitis andHarrison 1989, O'Donoghue et al 1998), meaning that it may compete with lynx over the latter species' preferred prey (snowshoe hare, Lepus americanus Erxleben). For example, O'Donoghue et al (1997) found that the numerical response of coyote and lynx to a snowshoe hare cycle in southwest Yukon were similar, and coyotes and lynx are the two most important mammalian predators of snowshoe hares throughout much of the boreal forest (O'Donoghue et al 1998). Furthermore, coyotes do kill lynx, and there is speculation that coyotes could influence lynx more so than does the availability of snowshoe hares (Buskirk et al 2000, Bayne et al 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To produce limit cycles remotely comparable to the Kluane cycles, the maximum generalist predation rate for the May model needs to be close to the lower bound of the Kluane estimate (0.1 prey/ha/year), and the R-M model requires a rate below the mid-range value (1.0 prey/ha/year). One possible explanation is that this estimate includes removals from predators who function as specialists in Canada and actually cycle along with snowshoe hares (O'Donoghue et al 1997, Rohner et al 2001, Roth et al 2007. In this case, the upper bound for the maximum generalist predation rate is likely lower.…”
Section: Scenario 2: Generalist Predationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, certain hare predators have been shown to function closer to specialists in the Yukon, cycling along with the hare and contributing to its cyclic dynamics (O'Donoghue et al 1997, Rohner et al 2001. Therefore, a model incorporating multiple specialist preda-tors similar to that of Tyson et al (2010) may provide a better baseline for the northern dynamics.…”
Section: Future Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lynx often undertake large dispersal movements, primarily in response to region-wide cyclic reductions in Snowshoe Hare populations (see Movements, below). These pulses of dispersal, with some individuals moving >500 km (Ward and Krebs 1985;Slough and Mowat 1996;O'Donoghue et al 1997;Poole 1997), result in periodic shifts of distribution into the periphery of areas where they do not normally occur (Banfield 1974;Mech 1973Mech , 1977. These populations may persist for only a few years or, given the right circumstances, may establish breeding populations.…”
Section: Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%