2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1802.02564
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Semigroups Generated by Concatenation of Arithmetic Sequences

Abstract: We introduce the notion of numerical semigroups generated by concatenation of arithmetic sequences and show that this class of numerical semigroups exhibit multiple interesting behaviours.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, n+(e−3)d, for suitable positive integers m, n, d. It is clearly a concatenation of two arithmetic sequences with the same common difference d. Moreover, with suitable condition on these integers we can make sure that this concatenation can not be completed to a complete arithmetic sequence with first term m and common difference d. We feel that semigroups generated by such sequences would give us a model for creating examples of numerical semigroups whose cardinality of a minimal presentation and also perhaps the higher Betti numbers are not bounded functions of the embedding dimension e. This would then generalize examples defined by Bresinsky [3], [5], in arbitrary embedding dimension. In light of this study and [4], it seems that one requires a non-linear dependence between the integers m and e in order to obtain the right generalization of Bresinsky's examples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…, n+(e−3)d, for suitable positive integers m, n, d. It is clearly a concatenation of two arithmetic sequences with the same common difference d. Moreover, with suitable condition on these integers we can make sure that this concatenation can not be completed to a complete arithmetic sequence with first term m and common difference d. We feel that semigroups generated by such sequences would give us a model for creating examples of numerical semigroups whose cardinality of a minimal presentation and also perhaps the higher Betti numbers are not bounded functions of the embedding dimension e. This would then generalize examples defined by Bresinsky [3], [5], in arbitrary embedding dimension. In light of this study and [4], it seems that one requires a non-linear dependence between the integers m and e in order to obtain the right generalization of Bresinsky's examples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, some special types of numerical semigroups have received a large amount of attention, and the invariants of these numerical semigroups are often well-understood. This includes numerical semigroups with small embedding dimensions [2,8,16], numerical semigroups generated by arithmetic progressions [6,10], and d-symmetric numerical semigroups [15]. For example, the following very fundamental result is due to Sylvester.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is certainly interesting is that n 1 + n 2 = n 3 + n 4 , for the sequence of integers n = (n 1 , n 2 , n 3 , n 4 ) given by Bresinsky. We have initiated a study of numerical semigroups defined by a sequence of integers formed by concatenation of two arithmetic sequences and we believe that such semigroups with correct conditions would finally give us a good model of numerical semigroups in arbitrary embedding dimension with unbounded Betti numbers; see [10], [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%