2021
DOI: 10.3390/en14030592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulation Analysis of Ag Crystallite Effects on Interface of Front Metal and Silicon in the PERC Solar Cell

Abstract: In the fabrication of crystalline silicon solar cells, the contact properties between the front metal electrode and silicon are one of the most important parameters for achieving high-efficiency, as it is an integral element in the formation of solar cell electrodes. This entails an increase in the surface recombination velocity and a drop in the open-circuit voltage of the solar cell; hence, controlling the recombination velocity at the metal-silicon interface becomes a critical factor in the process. In this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it provides higher efficiency potential than the Al-BSF device [13][14][15]; contact recombination loss in passivated PERC devices near the metal/silicon interface still exists. When metal is placed directly near the silicon interface, it generates a higher surface recombination velocity (SRV) (∼10 6 cm s −1 ), leading to ∼50% contact recombination losses [16][17][18]. Thus, contact recombination losses have emerged as a limiting factor in PERC devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it provides higher efficiency potential than the Al-BSF device [13][14][15]; contact recombination loss in passivated PERC devices near the metal/silicon interface still exists. When metal is placed directly near the silicon interface, it generates a higher surface recombination velocity (SRV) (∼10 6 cm s −1 ), leading to ∼50% contact recombination losses [16][17][18]. Thus, contact recombination losses have emerged as a limiting factor in PERC devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of PV parameters of simulated PERC devices with theoretical PERC performances[31][32][33][34]54,74,75 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%