2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2014.04.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation and convergence analysis of a high-order conservative difference scheme for SRLW equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact on the results of the actual value of a small parameter normalθ in a nonlinear term is judiciously evaluated by numerical experiments and show that, for θ ( 1 , 0.5 ) , the results are correct with the same significant digits as the truncation error. The numerical results of the proposed format are compared with the numerical results of , and the results show that the proposed format has higher error accuracy. Moreover, the present method gives an implicit linear system, which can be easily implemented.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The impact on the results of the actual value of a small parameter normalθ in a nonlinear term is judiciously evaluated by numerical experiments and show that, for θ ( 1 , 0.5 ) , the results are correct with the same significant digits as the truncation error. The numerical results of the proposed format are compared with the numerical results of , and the results show that the proposed format has higher error accuracy. Moreover, the present method gives an implicit linear system, which can be easily implemented.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compute the error at the different times and compare it to the error from methods in to illustrate the accuracy of the scheme. In Tables and , the comparisons of e , h by the compact scheme with the Hu et al scheme and the Yimnet et al scheme are shown. From Tables and , we can see that our compact scheme is acceptable.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations