1981
DOI: 10.1002/app.1981.070260420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of a tubular polymerization reactor

Abstract: SynopsisA mathematical model for a tubular emulsion polymerization reactor is developed. The partial differential equations describing the mass balances on initiator, monomer, and number of polymer particles are numerically solved using an implicit-explicit scheme based on the Crank-Nicholson method. The model adequately simulates experimental results reported by Rollin and co-workers and sufficiently explains the unusual behavior of the reactor when operating a t relatively low emulsifier concentrations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A nonlinear model, with simple kinetics, to simulate the styrene emulsion polymerization was developed by Lynch and Kiparissides (1981), and is used in this work. This model, originally developed for tubular reactors with full recycle, has been adapted for use in batch and semibatch processes.…”
Section: Off-line Analysis and On-line Monitoring Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nonlinear model, with simple kinetics, to simulate the styrene emulsion polymerization was developed by Lynch and Kiparissides (1981), and is used in this work. This model, originally developed for tubular reactors with full recycle, has been adapted for use in batch and semibatch processes.…”
Section: Off-line Analysis and On-line Monitoring Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A non-linear model to simulate styrene emulsion polymerisation was developed by Lynch and Kiparissides (1981), and used in this case study for data generation and model performance evaluation. This model has been lightly modified for use in both batch and semi-batch policies.…”
Section: Case Study I Control Of Np and Xmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because turbulent flow produced smaller monomer drops which absorbed more surfactant, this leads to fewer micelles and hence fewer polymer particles. Lynch and Kiparissides (1981) simulated the turbulent flow regime experiments of Rollin et al (1977). Their monodisperse model included axial dispersion of initiator (which they found to contribute negligibly to the initiator concentration profile), micellar nucleation, and particle loss by coalescence.…”
Section: Loop Reactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%