2005
DOI: 10.3133/sir20055201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of aquifer tests, west-central Florida

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Walton (2007) recommends analysis of multi-well aquifer tests through simulation utilizing parameter estimation. Some of the tests conducted since the mid-1990s were analyzed with numerical models (Sepulveda, 2006;Yobbi and Halford, 2008;Gonthier, 2011) that utilize a modifi ed version of MODFLOW 1996 (Harbaugh and McDonald, 1996) called MODOPTIM (Halford, 2006).…”
Section: Types Of Tests and Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walton (2007) recommends analysis of multi-well aquifer tests through simulation utilizing parameter estimation. Some of the tests conducted since the mid-1990s were analyzed with numerical models (Sepulveda, 2006;Yobbi and Halford, 2008;Gonthier, 2011) that utilize a modifi ed version of MODFLOW 1996 (Harbaugh and McDonald, 1996) called MODOPTIM (Halford, 2006).…”
Section: Types Of Tests and Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aquifer testing provides the most integrated assessment of hydraulic connectivity within complex geologic systems (Yobbi and Halford, 2008). Drawdown in observation wells that penetrate a structural block different from that intersected by the pumping well provides direct evidence of a hydraulic connection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aquifer-test data from complexly layered aquifers and confining units frequently are interpreted with numerical models to evaluate hydraulic properties of the local geologic system. Numerical simulations combine aquifer-test data with knowledge of hydrogeologic framework to provide a more accurate characterization of complex groundwater systems than analytical models alone (Yobbi and Halford, 2008;Walton, 2008). Hydraulic properties of geologic structures and the effects of these structures on drawdown behavior can be interpreted from aquifer test results because of the flexibility of numerical models (Renard, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aquifer testing provides the most integrated assessment of hydraulic connectivity in complex geologic systems (Yobbi and Halford, 2008). The aquifer volume investigated increases with the distance between the pumping well and observation wells where drawdown is detected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical simulations that combine observed drawdowns from aquifer testing with knowledge of the hydrogeologic framework provide a more accurate characterization of complex groundwater systems than analytical models alone (Walton, 2008;Yobbi and Halford, 2008). The flexibility of numerical models allows for hydraulic characterization of hydrostratigraphic units and structural features and for evaluation of structural effects on drawdown behavior (Renard, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%