2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-014-0627-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulation of Crack Growth and Coalescence in Rock-Like Materials Containing Multiple Pre-existing Flaws

Abstract: A novel meshless numerical method, called general particle dynamics (GPD), is proposed to simulate samples of rock-like brittle heterogeneous material containing four preexisting flaws under uniaxial compressive loads. Numerical simulations are conducted to investigate the initiation, growth, and coalescence of cracks using a GPD code. An elasto-brittle damage model based on an extension of the Hoek-Brown strength criterion is applied to reflect crack initiation, growth, and coalescence and the macrofailure of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
81
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the viewpoint of laboratory experiments, acoustic emission (AE), photographic monitoring, digital image correlation (DIC), and computed tomography (CT) scanning techniques are adopted to capture the crack evolution process in rock that contains pre-existing flaws under compression or tension. [12][13][14][15] From the view point of numerical simulation, crack initiation and coalescence process of rock is reproduced in RFPA3D, 16 FLAC, 17 AUTODYN, 18 FEMDEM, 19 NOSB-PD, 20 NMM, 21 GPD, 22 and particle flow code (PFC). 23 To simulate the loading-type failure of underground openings, Fakhimi et al 24 tested a sandstone specimen that contains a central hole under biaxial compression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the viewpoint of laboratory experiments, acoustic emission (AE), photographic monitoring, digital image correlation (DIC), and computed tomography (CT) scanning techniques are adopted to capture the crack evolution process in rock that contains pre-existing flaws under compression or tension. [12][13][14][15] From the view point of numerical simulation, crack initiation and coalescence process of rock is reproduced in RFPA3D, 16 FLAC, 17 AUTODYN, 18 FEMDEM, 19 NOSB-PD, 20 NMM, 21 GPD, 22 and particle flow code (PFC). 23 To simulate the loading-type failure of underground openings, Fakhimi et al 24 tested a sandstone specimen that contains a central hole under biaxial compression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu and Wong and Zhang et al adopted NMM to predict the propagation of tensile and shear fractures. Zhou et al investigated the crack initiation, growth, and coalescence in rock‐like materials containing multiple preexisting flaws using GPD. However, they have their inherent deficiencies in modelling fracture problems, including mesh dependency, when the crack path is uncertain before, or in considering both merging and branching of multiple cracks with no additional techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, crack path prediction is crucial in engineering practices. Various methods can be applied to study cracking characteristics and failure mechanisms and to simulate the evolution process of cracks, including the infrared imaging technique, the finite element method, the extended finite element method, the peridynamics, the general particle dynamics, the phase‐field method with the arc‐length method and level‐set techniques, and the burgeoning computed tomography techniques . For example, Miranda et al predicted the propagation life of cracks in generic 2D structural components using a cost‐effective two‐phase methodology; Geißler et al estimated discrete crack paths using the adaptive modified nodal coordinates and element boundary combined with a finite element framework; Haeri et al investigated the crack initiation, propagation, and coalescence process of brittle materials using the higher‐order displacement discontinuity method and Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images and studied the crack propagation mechanism of precracked rock‐like materials; Azevedo et al combined a natural neighbor radial point interpolation method with the meshless method to predict the crack path of materials and extended it to fracture mechanics; Wick et al proposed a rate‐dependent formulation to solve the crack propagation problems in elasticity and elastoplasticity conditions in the phase field framework; Zhao et al proposed a new data analysis method to investigate the morphological changes in a single fracture of rocks under different confining pressures based on transient pulse tests and 3D laser scanning; and Martínez et al discussed fretting fatigue crack trajectory using the extended finite element method (XFEM) method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%