2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of experimentally shear-tested contact specimens from existing dam joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The element sizes selected are in the same range as the acceptable element size of 2 mm reported by Renaud et al [44] for the numerical simulation of the direct shear test of unbonded rough concrete-rock interface with a cylindrical sample having a diameter between 83 mm and 145 mm.…”
Section: Generation Of the Meshmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The element sizes selected are in the same range as the acceptable element size of 2 mm reported by Renaud et al [44] for the numerical simulation of the direct shear test of unbonded rough concrete-rock interface with a cylindrical sample having a diameter between 83 mm and 145 mm.…”
Section: Generation Of the Meshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gutiérrez et al [43] used the discrete element method to simulate the direct shear test of unbonded concrete-rock interfaces. Renaud et al [44] used finite element modeling to conduct 3D simulations of direct shear tests of unbonded and naturally rough concrete-rock interfaces with an explicit representation of the topography of the interface. Dong et al [45] presented a 3D numerical modeling that captures the behavior of rock bolts and shotcrete-rock interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyzing its constituents' relative orientation, described by fabric tensors, allows for a systematical structure characterization [SJCT20]. Such knowledge can then be exploited in numerical simulations, e.g., to assess the stability of dams [RBM20] or waste reservoirs [MGV*17, RBR*20].…”
Section: Geomechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%