2014
DOI: 10.3126/jie.v9i1.10676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulation of Flow around a Spur Dike with Free Surface Flow in Fixed Flat Bed

Abstract: This paper presents a numerical model to simulate two-dimensional flow near a spur-dike. The Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) program namely Nays 2D has been used to simulate the flow field in a fixed flat bed around the spur dike introduced into the flow at 90° to the stream-wise direction. Cubic-Interpolated PseudoParticle (CIP) method was used as finite difference method to analyze the advection terms. In addition, several turbulence closurer models k-ε model, zero equation model and constant eddy viscosi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To study wake flow behind bluff bodies, it is important to measure the reattachment length and maximum recirculation width of the separated flow. The reattachment length (𝐿 𝑟 ) and maximum recirculation width (𝑊 𝑟 ) might be defined as the size of the flow separation bubble in the streamwise direction (rear point distance to the stagnation point of streamwise velocity [55]) and crosswise direction (the symmetry axis distance to the stagnation point of crosswise velocity [56]), respectively, see Fig. 9(a).…”
Section: Comparison Of Flow Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study wake flow behind bluff bodies, it is important to measure the reattachment length and maximum recirculation width of the separated flow. The reattachment length (𝐿 𝑟 ) and maximum recirculation width (𝑊 𝑟 ) might be defined as the size of the flow separation bubble in the streamwise direction (rear point distance to the stagnation point of streamwise velocity [55]) and crosswise direction (the symmetry axis distance to the stagnation point of crosswise velocity [56]), respectively, see Fig. 9(a).…”
Section: Comparison Of Flow Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the RNG k À 1 model can predict the mean velocities and hence recommend the same. Kafle (2013) uses a 2D numerical model with CIP techniques to simulate flow field in spur dyke present at 90-degree channel bend. The turbulence models such as k À 1 model, zero equation models, and constant eddy viscosity model were implemented and compared.…”
Section: Graphical Abstract Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%