1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0267-7261(99)00022-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of ground flow caused by seismic liquefaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To predict the lateral displacement, various empirical (Valsamis et al 2010;Finn and Fujita 2002;Tamate and Towhata 1999) and numerical methods have been proposed. Youd (1992, 1995) have introduced an empirical model using a multi-linear regression model (MLR).…”
Section: Application Of Soft Computing For Lateral Spreadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To predict the lateral displacement, various empirical (Valsamis et al 2010;Finn and Fujita 2002;Tamate and Towhata 1999) and numerical methods have been proposed. Youd (1992, 1995) have introduced an empirical model using a multi-linear regression model (MLR).…”
Section: Application Of Soft Computing For Lateral Spreadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ereafter, Tamate and Towhata [18] regarded the liquefied soil as viscous fluid and analyzed the flow characteristic of liquefied sand by using the principle of minimum potential energy. Hadush et al [19] treated liquefied sand as Bingham fluid with yield strength, proposed and proved a numerical method based on fluid dynamics theory to predict deformation caused by liquefied soil, and used this method to reproduce liquefaction flow by the shaking table test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under seismic loading, the rapid increase in pore water pressure quickly decreases the shear strength of the unconsolidated sediment, possibly triggering large shear deformation. As flow failure of the ground during an earthquake may be caused by either the dynamic force due to the seismic acceleration or the static gravity force due to the topography of the ground (Tamate and Towhata 1999), flow deformation of post-liquefaction soil may continue under a gravitational load after seismic shaking ceases. In this case, the ground surface is prone to large-scale flow deformation regardless of whether it is flat or gently inclined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%