2008
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2007.916297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulation of Inductive Method and Permanent-Magnet Method for Measuring Critical Current Density

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After applying the backward Euler method to (5), we get the following discretized equations [1][2][3]:…”
Section: Backward Euler Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…After applying the backward Euler method to (5), we get the following discretized equations [1][2][3]:…”
Section: Backward Euler Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The execution rate is equal to 100% for the case with N ≤ 13, whereas the time evolution process is terminated due to an overflow for the case with N ≥ 14. On the other hand, the nonlinear strength N has been usually chosen such that N ≥ 16 in the shielding current analysis of a HTS thin film [3]. In this sense, the adaptive step-size control algorithm is not applicable to the shielding current analysis.…”
Section: Runge-kutta Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations