2019
DOI: 10.1364/ome.9.004194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of multi-pulsed femtosecond laser ablation: effect of a moving laser focus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ablation depth increases linearly with the number of incident ablation cycles as cycle numbers and laser intensities increase, and the microgroove surfaces become smoother and more uniform. Since the absorption coefficient a and reflectivity r are temperature-dependent parameters, the ablation threshold fluence for a given copper is as well [15,16]. The parameters of ablation threshold fluence ๐น๐น ๐‘ก๐‘กโ„Ž (๐‘๐‘, ๐‘ค๐‘ค(๐‘ง๐‘ง โ€ฒ )), absorbed flux of the moving incident laser ๐น๐น(๐‘ƒ๐‘ƒ, ๐‘ค๐‘ค(๐‘ง๐‘ง โ€ฒ ), ๐‘’๐‘’), and effective penetration depth ๐‘™๐‘™ ๐‘ ๐‘  in (17) cannot be explicitly calculated from the experimental conditions because the temperature of the interactive surface changes continuously during ablation at different rates, based on the scanning speed ๐‘ฃ๐‘ฃ, laser power ๐‘ƒ๐‘ƒ, wavelength ๐œ†๐œ†, repetition rate ๐‘“๐‘“, pulse duration ๐œ๐œ, focal spot size 2๐‘ค๐‘ค ๐‘œ๐‘œ , and copper type However, the experimental results show that the ablation depth increases linearly with the number of cycles; thus, using known parameters for specific initial ablation conditions, one can fit the theoretical formula with the experimentally acquired data to achieve a robust formula of ablation-cycle-dependent depth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ablation depth increases linearly with the number of incident ablation cycles as cycle numbers and laser intensities increase, and the microgroove surfaces become smoother and more uniform. Since the absorption coefficient a and reflectivity r are temperature-dependent parameters, the ablation threshold fluence for a given copper is as well [15,16]. The parameters of ablation threshold fluence ๐น๐น ๐‘ก๐‘กโ„Ž (๐‘๐‘, ๐‘ค๐‘ค(๐‘ง๐‘ง โ€ฒ )), absorbed flux of the moving incident laser ๐น๐น(๐‘ƒ๐‘ƒ, ๐‘ค๐‘ค(๐‘ง๐‘ง โ€ฒ ), ๐‘’๐‘’), and effective penetration depth ๐‘™๐‘™ ๐‘ ๐‘  in (17) cannot be explicitly calculated from the experimental conditions because the temperature of the interactive surface changes continuously during ablation at different rates, based on the scanning speed ๐‘ฃ๐‘ฃ, laser power ๐‘ƒ๐‘ƒ, wavelength ๐œ†๐œ†, repetition rate ๐‘“๐‘“, pulse duration ๐œ๐œ, focal spot size 2๐‘ค๐‘ค ๐‘œ๐‘œ , and copper type However, the experimental results show that the ablation depth increases linearly with the number of cycles; thus, using known parameters for specific initial ablation conditions, one can fit the theoretical formula with the experimentally acquired data to achieve a robust formula of ablation-cycle-dependent depth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, once the lattice temperature is 0.9 times higher than the thermodynamic critical temperature of the copper (T cr = 7696 K) at the ablation temperature, ablation is triggered off and the material region above the ablation temperature is removed. [33,34] As a result, the contour of the ablation crater is obtained.…”
Section: Surface Ablationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a decreasing influence of the applied fluence at very high repetition rates and a decreasing ablation threshold were observed, without any reduction in the resulting quality as a result of heat accumulation. Due to the importance of avoiding heat accumulation for fast industrial USP laser-based machining processes, it is often investigated by thermal simulations focusing the heating of the material adjacent to the ablation [17][18][19][20][21] . Bornschlegel et al also investigated the heat distribution during USP laser ablation of 1.4301 stainless steel by measuring the workpiece temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%