“…This 1D-domain of a pristine (i.e., uncracked) concrete section is shown in Figure 6. The concrete section has a thickness of L = 0.2 m, a fraction of which comprises a CAC-based top-layer of thickness x c = 0.025 m. The depth of the reinforcing steel from the upper surface (i.e., the cover depth) is assumed to be x r = 0.050 m. To describe ion transport, the following assumptions were made:
- The porosity of the concrete and the CAC-based top-layers is saturated with pore solution,
- Advective transport of ions is negligible as a zero pressure gradient is assumed in the pores, hence the pore solution velocity (and Péclet number) is zero, assuming no moisture transport is induced by cyclic wetting-and-drying [43,77],
- The effects of ion-activity (i.e., non-ideality of the solution) on transport are not accounted for since this factor exerts second order contributions to the transport response [78,79],
- The effects of electrical coupling between ions is significant enough to warrant multispecies modeling [42,80], and,
- The electrical double layer present on the hydrated solids does not affect transport [81], since ion transport takes place dominantly through larger capillary pores which remain percolated, rather than through the nanoscale gel pores, e.g., as present in the C-S-H [68].
…”