2019
DOI: 10.1115/1.4043436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulation of Natural Gas Pipeline Transients

Abstract: Simulations of natural gas pipeline transients provide an insight into a pipeline capacity to deliver gas to consumers or to accumulate gas from source wells during various abnormal conditions and under variable consumption rates. This information is used for the control of gas pressure and for planning repairs in a timely manner. Therefore, a numerical model and a computer code have been developed for the simulation of natural gas transients in pipelines. The developed approach is validated by simulations of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pipeline outlet pressure simulated from the OLGA model is mentioned in Figure 5. It can be observed that the developed model is in good agreement with the experimental results [50] and other simulated studies [51][52][53]. It can be observed that pressure at the outlet is maintained constant in the start followed by constant increment while the mass flow rate was constantly decreased at the same time.…”
Section: Olga Model Validationsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pipeline outlet pressure simulated from the OLGA model is mentioned in Figure 5. It can be observed that the developed model is in good agreement with the experimental results [50] and other simulated studies [51][52][53]. It can be observed that pressure at the outlet is maintained constant in the start followed by constant increment while the mass flow rate was constantly decreased at the same time.…”
Section: Olga Model Validationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…It can be observed that pressure at the outlet is maintained constant in the start followed by constant increment while the mass flow rate was constantly decreased at the same time. There was a delay of around 1.8 h between maximum pressure and minimum mass flow rate, this difference was due to the inertia effect [53].…”
Section: Olga Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is caused by the valve closure and a sudden decrease in the outlet mass flow rate (Figure 6A). The inertia effect resulted in a 1.8 h delay between the maximum pressure and the lowest mass flow rate 45 . Similarly, when the mass flow rate increased again, the pressure decreased, eventually reaching its lowest point in 15.2 h. The numerical investigation showed a progressive increase in pressure after roughly 16 h, whereas the measured pressure is practically constant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…2. The code was validated for several transient conditions, such as: the main steam pipeline break [5], water hammers in two-phase systems [11], water hammer with gaseous cavitation [12] and natural gas pipeline transients [13].…”
Section: Calculation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%