Proceedings of the Conference on Recent Advances in Rock Engineering (RARE 2016) 2016
DOI: 10.2991/rare-16.2016.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of roof bolt system during depillaring operations in bord and pillar panel

Abstract: Abstract-Roof bolting technology is widely used for support design in an underground coal mine. This paper focused on the numerical simulation considered the behaviour of roof and rock -grout -bolt interaction. Simulation of three dimensional model of depillaring panel with roof bolt support is difficult to simulate. Therefore, an analogy has been developed to replicate three dimensional depillaring panel into two dimension considered physico-mechanical properties of the immediate roof, geotechnical property o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, the Numerical modelling technique is a widely acceptable and more appropriate technique for support design and stability assessment in underground structures such as tunnels, galleries, junctions, and working face in underground coal mines. Several authors such as [5], [6], [7], [8] has suggested that the numerical tool is far more advanced as compared to an empirical method and they considered FOS to be 1.5 to obtain rock load height for stable cases. The rock mass classification is a prime input parameter in the numerical method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the Numerical modelling technique is a widely acceptable and more appropriate technique for support design and stability assessment in underground structures such as tunnels, galleries, junctions, and working face in underground coal mines. Several authors such as [5], [6], [7], [8] has suggested that the numerical tool is far more advanced as compared to an empirical method and they considered FOS to be 1.5 to obtain rock load height for stable cases. The rock mass classification is a prime input parameter in the numerical method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%