2014
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2014.335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of sand waves in a turbulent open channel flow

Abstract: We develop a coupled hydro-morphodynamic numerical model for carrying out large-eddy simulation of stratified, turbulent flow over a mobile sand bed. The method is based on the curvilinear immersed boundary approach of Khosronejad et al. (Adv. Water Resour., vol. 34, 2011, pp. 829-843). We apply this method to simulate sand wave initiation, growth and evolution in a mobile bed laboratory open channel, which was studied experimentally by Venditti & Church (J. Geophys. Res., vol. 110, 2005, F01009). We show th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
70
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
4
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be acknowledged that in the published article we (1) mistakenly used the same symbols for the dynamic viscosity of water and the molecular diffusion coefficient of the scalar, (2) neglected to include the value used for the molecular diffusion, and (3) did not mention that σ * is the reciprocal of the turbulent Schmidt number. Although these details should have been included, these omissions do not change well‐established facts that in turbulent flows the mixing of the solute by molecular diffusion is many orders of magnitude less important than that induced by turbulent eddies (Chawdhary et al, ; Chou & Fringer, ; Gualtieri et al, ; Gualtieri & Bombardelli, ; Khosronejad & Sotiropoulos, ; Scalo et al, ). As we mentioned in Khosronejad et al (), the viscous sublayer in Eagle Creek was not resolved in our simulations, as the first node away from the solid boundaries in wall units was (on average) equal to z + = 45 (see Table 3 in Khosronejad et al, ).…”
Section: Response To Criticism Of Misrepresentation Of Scalar Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be acknowledged that in the published article we (1) mistakenly used the same symbols for the dynamic viscosity of water and the molecular diffusion coefficient of the scalar, (2) neglected to include the value used for the molecular diffusion, and (3) did not mention that σ * is the reciprocal of the turbulent Schmidt number. Although these details should have been included, these omissions do not change well‐established facts that in turbulent flows the mixing of the solute by molecular diffusion is many orders of magnitude less important than that induced by turbulent eddies (Chawdhary et al, ; Chou & Fringer, ; Gualtieri et al, ; Gualtieri & Bombardelli, ; Khosronejad & Sotiropoulos, ; Scalo et al, ). As we mentioned in Khosronejad et al (), the viscous sublayer in Eagle Creek was not resolved in our simulations, as the first node away from the solid boundaries in wall units was (on average) equal to z + = 45 (see Table 3 in Khosronejad et al, ).…”
Section: Response To Criticism Of Misrepresentation Of Scalar Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volume fraction of conservative tracer ( ψ ) is modeled as a passive scalar whose transport is governed by the following convection‐diffusion equation [ Chou and Fringer , , ; Kraft et al , ; Khosronejad and Sotiropoulos , ]: 1J(ρψ)∂t+(ρUjψ)ξj=ξj()(μ+σμt)GjkJ∂ψξk where σ ∗ is the Schmidt number (= 0.75) [ Khosronejad et al , ] and μ t is the eddy viscosity obtained from LES model [ Kang and Sotiropoulos , ].…”
Section: The Vsl3d Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details of the numerical method for solving the flow, solute transport, and turbulence closure governing equations in complex domains have already been documented extensively elsewhere [ Ge and Sotiropoulos , ; Borazjani et al , ; Kang et al , ; Khosronejad and Sotiropoulos , ], and only a brief summary of key elements of the method will be given here. The governing equations for resolved flow field are discretized in space on a hybrid staggered/nonstaggered grid arrangement [ Gilmanov and Sotiropoulos , ; Ge and Sotiropoulos , ] using second‐order accurate central differencing for the convective terms along with second‐order accurate, three‐point central differencing for the divergence, pressure gradient, and viscous‐like terms.…”
Section: The Vsl3d Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerical models have been used to simulate the interaction of bedforms and hydrodynamics (El Kheiashy et al, ; Khosronejad & Sotiropoulos, ; Lefebvre, Paarlberg, & Winter, ; Omidyeganeh & Piomelli, ; Stoesser et al, ). They compensate for limitations in field and flume measurements as they allow simulations of high‐resolution near‐bed flow fields, provide estimate of turbulence, and can be used with a variety of boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%