2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2017.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of scale-up effects of methanol-to-olefins fluidized bed reactors

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The association of this activity distribution function with the yields of products is not trivial in reactions with complex networks, such as the MTO and DTO processes. A simplified solution was the assumption of concentration-independent expressions for deactivation kinetics. , Among the works that relate deactivation to the content of coke, several authors simulated the expected coke distribution function resulting from the RTD of the catalyst during the MTO process. , Nonetheless, most of the complex models for fluidized bed reactors neglect this issue by operating at full conversion and excess of catalyst. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association of this activity distribution function with the yields of products is not trivial in reactions with complex networks, such as the MTO and DTO processes. A simplified solution was the assumption of concentration-independent expressions for deactivation kinetics. , Among the works that relate deactivation to the content of coke, several authors simulated the expected coke distribution function resulting from the RTD of the catalyst during the MTO process. , Nonetheless, most of the complex models for fluidized bed reactors neglect this issue by operating at full conversion and excess of catalyst. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the virtual experiments, even though it is attractive because both true key hydrodynamic parameters and the corresponding interelectrode capacitance can be known, the disadvantage is that the state-of-the-art CFD models cannot always predict all flow patterns encountered in a real fluidized bed. 58,59 In addition, the calculated interelectrode capacitance, even though incorporated with the effect of noise, still deviates from the measured data in experiments. In the future, if these problems can be well addressed, the challenging inverse problem of ECT can be truly avoided and key hydrodynamic parameters with higher accuracy can be directly derived from the normalized capacitance measurements by the trained machine learning model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Therefore, it may be difficult to construct a one‐to‐one relationship between the normalized capacitance measurements of ECT and the corresponding key hydrodynamic parameters obtained by other measurement techniques. For the virtual experiments, even though it is attractive because both true key hydrodynamic parameters and the corresponding interelectrode capacitance can be known, the disadvantage is that the state‐of‐the‐art CFD models cannot always predict all flow patterns encountered in a real fluidized bed . In addition, the calculated interelectrode capacitance, even though incorporated with the effect of noise, still deviates from the measured data in experiments.…”
Section: Power and Limitations Of The Machine Learning Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the computational cost point of view, the number of catalyst particles rapidly increase in scaling‐up the gas‐solid reactors, including the CFBs. For example, in the development of the MTO reactors, the catalyst inventory in the pilot‐, demo‐, and commercial‐scale reactors are typically in the kilogram, hundred kilogram, and hundred ton ranges, respectively, corresponding to 1e10 , 1e12, and 1e14 real particles roughly . Although current simulation corresponds to the demo‐scale reactor according to the number of particles, the methods developed in this work could be readily extended to larger gas‐solid reactors if more computing resource is available because they are very suitable to large‐scale parallel computing.…”
Section: Conclusion and Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%