27th Joint Propulsion Conference 1991
DOI: 10.2514/6.1991-2341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of self-field MPD thrusters

Abstract: A fully two dimensional magnetohydrodyanamics code has been developed to predict self-field, steady-state MPD thruster performance. The governing equations are outlined, and methods of solution are presented. fl Hall parameter (ed),

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system features a 678 in. 3 internal volume scuba tank rated to 3000 psi as a propellant plenum and an Omega SV251 3-way solenoid valve. A 0.0625-in.…”
Section: Pulsed Gas Feed Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The system features a 678 in. 3 internal volume scuba tank rated to 3000 psi as a propellant plenum and an Omega SV251 3-way solenoid valve. A 0.0625-in.…”
Section: Pulsed Gas Feed Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principal, a MPDT operating at MW power levels can achieve specific impulses over the range of 1700-4000 s at thrust levels in the 10 s of newtons. [1][2][3] Experimental performance characterization at these power levels has identified fundamental problems regarding the discharge plasma stability and electrode erosion. 1,2,[4][5][6][7][8] The MPDT is a coaxial-type plasma accelerator, and a generalized cross-sectional view of which is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LaPointe (19) developed a two-temperature code to simulate self-field MPD thrusters and tested this model against the experimental results of the Princeton University full-scale benchmark thruster operated It is obvious from this formula that the thrust coefficient is independent of current, mass flow rate, and propellant type. Therefore, this model always contradicts with experimental measurements.…”
Section: Lapointe Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 All calculations are performed here for a single value of E\lrn^i^ji n -0.022, mks, equivalent to a J 2 /(dm/dt) value of ~20 [kA 2 /(g/s)], a stable operating regime below the critical "onset" mode. 1 ' 23 Flow through the injection wall is assumed isentropic, with total temperature T 0 -1000 K, and the flow Mach number treated as a variable, with 1 < M < 3. The neutral particle velocity is assumed constant for X Q < x < x 1 and is given by u n = a 0 M/(l + M 2 /3) 1/2 with a 0 = (yRT 0 ) l/2 and y = f.…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%