2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2015.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of single-pulse laser ablation for dressing a bronze-bond diamond grinding wheel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, researchers conducting simulations of laser ablation processes prefer to study the evolution of the internal temperature field, velocity field, and ablation craters of laser ablation, in addition to capturing the material loss after laser action. 21 The numerical models are no longer satisfied with a simple mass conservation criterion. Many models are beginning to take surface tension, 22 evaporative recoil, phase explosion mechanisms, 23 and plasma expansion 24,25 into account so as to more accurately predict the morphology produced by laser ablation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently, researchers conducting simulations of laser ablation processes prefer to study the evolution of the internal temperature field, velocity field, and ablation craters of laser ablation, in addition to capturing the material loss after laser action. 21 The numerical models are no longer satisfied with a simple mass conservation criterion. Many models are beginning to take surface tension, 22 evaporative recoil, phase explosion mechanisms, 23 and plasma expansion 24,25 into account so as to more accurately predict the morphology produced by laser ablation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, researchers conducting simulations of laser ablation processes prefer to study the evolution of the internal temperature field, velocity field, and ablation craters of laser ablation, in addition to capturing the material loss after laser action 21 . The numerical models are no longer satisfied with a simple mass conservation criterion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%