2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2016.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of soil–cone penetrometer interaction using discrete element method

Abstract: One of the most common methods to measure soil strength in-situ is cone penetrometers. In this paper the development of a three dimensional (3D) discrete element model (DEM) for the simulation of the soil-cone penetrometer interaction in a slightly cohesive loamy sand soil is presented. The aim was to investigate the effects of the soil model's geometrical (e.g., soil model cross section shape and size and model's height) changes on variations in the soil penetration resistance. The model area ratio and height… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to ASABE (2019), in very hard soil where it is not possible to achieve a rate of 3 cm s −1 , slower rates do not result in significant errors. In a similar investigation, Kotrocz, Mouazen, and Kerényi (2016) used a penetration rate of 1 cm s −1 and Kuhwald et al (2016) a penetration rate of 2 cm s −1 . Finally, the cone and shaft were thoroughly washed and wiped between each penetration test in accordance with recommendations of ASABE (2019).…”
Section: Cone Index Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to ASABE (2019), in very hard soil where it is not possible to achieve a rate of 3 cm s −1 , slower rates do not result in significant errors. In a similar investigation, Kotrocz, Mouazen, and Kerényi (2016) used a penetration rate of 1 cm s −1 and Kuhwald et al (2016) a penetration rate of 2 cm s −1 . Finally, the cone and shaft were thoroughly washed and wiped between each penetration test in accordance with recommendations of ASABE (2019).…”
Section: Cone Index Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2/a). The size of the model was chosen according to our earlier research [16] where it is proved, that the boundary of the model is far enough from the cone penetrometer, thus it has negligible effect on simulation results. The particles were created using the Simple Sequential Inhibition (SSI) technique [17], which places elements with random diameter to random locations.…”
Section: Discrete Element Simulations Of Cone Penetration Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, however, it is difficult to study its mesoscopic mechanical properties directly due to various restrictions of different conditions. Hence, using DEM, typically the program known as the particle flow code (PFC), is convenient to simulate the mechanical behavior of CGS fillers in terms of different particle interactions [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%