2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of springback using enhanced assumed strain elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, other continuum-type user elements can be coupled with the elasto-plastic constitutive models by means of the incremental kinematics framework described in this section. 9 …”
Section: Hardening Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, other continuum-type user elements can be coupled with the elasto-plastic constitutive models by means of the incremental kinematics framework described in this section. 9 …”
Section: Hardening Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to circumvent locking phenomena for three-dimensional low-order elements, several authors, like Bui et al [9], Areias et al [7] and Fontes Valente et al [17], have used the enhanced assumed strain (EAS) method (or incompatible mode method), based on Simo and Rifai's pioneer work [44]. The basis of such element formulations is given by the mixed variational principle in which the so-called incompatible strain and stress act as additional independent variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear Elements had to be used since as described by Konter (2000) in ABAQUS second-order quadrilateral elements at the contact surface will transfer the contact-force/pressure non-uniformly, sharing 1/6 on each corner node and 2/3 for each middle node. Moreover, Bui et al (2004) found linear elements with reduced integration to be very suitable for metal forming processes including large bending and large plastic strains, and compared to their fully integrated counterparts, do not suffer from shear locking.…”
Section: General Set Up Of Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resolution of the coupled problem is achieved in two steps: at first a mechanical step to solve the mechanical problem (see (5)) and secondly a thermal step to solve heat equation (see (9)) For the resolution of mechanical problem, the Newmark algorithm family is selected (see [5][6]). At each time step, the mechanical system (5) has to be solved for each node:…”
Section: Implicit Thermochanical Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%