44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2006
DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulation of Stall and Stall Control in Axial and Radial Compressors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This boundary condition extrapolates temperature, pressure, and tangential components of velocity to match the compressor exit mass flux corrected to the exit total condition (Ref. 7).…”
Section: Exit Boundary Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This boundary condition extrapolates temperature, pressure, and tangential components of velocity to match the compressor exit mass flux corrected to the exit total condition (Ref. 7).…”
Section: Exit Boundary Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A highresolution CFD solver, TURBO [10], has recently been proven to be capable of capturing the major characteristics of stall [11]. However, the large size of the simulation results and the lack of visualization tools specific to the problem pose significant challenges for the scientists to study the data.…”
Section: Motivation Background and Approach Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS)-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) results published in the literature tend to mispredict the performance of centrifugal compressors when compared to available data. [2][3][4][5] In general, the computations tend to over-predict total pressure ratio, efficiency, and in the case of vaned diffuser configurations, the choking flow rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An over-prediction in choking flow rate was observed in the CFD result, and this speed line serves to illustrate a trend seen throughout the literature. [2][3][4][5] The CFD results shown are converged, unsteady phaselag computations which were time-averaged over one revolution. Computed static pressures at the exit rating station were area-averaged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%