2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of the shear capacity of bolted side-plated RC beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison results showed a satisfactory agreement, which indicated that the proposed FEM model was reliable to use in conducting a parametric study on the shear performance of BSP beams. Considering the similarity, only the failure modes and load-deflection curves of the specimens Control and P3B2 are presented herein for simplicity (as shown in Figures 6 and 7); more details can be referred in to the literature of Li et al [32] presented herein for simplicity (as shown in Figures 6 and 7); more details can be referred in to the literature of Li et al [32] As is shown in Figure 7, the stiffness was characterized by the secant modulus Ke at the point P = 0.75 Pu (where Pu is the ultimate shear load), while δu was defined as maximum mid-span deflection corresponding to Pu and the modulus of toughness Ut (i.e., the area under the load-deflection curve) was adopted to quantify the amount of energy that the specimen absorbed in the whole loading process. The comparison between the experimental and numerical results (shown in Table 1) showed that the maximum errors of Pu and δu were 6.7% and 13.7%, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison Between Experimental and Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The comparison results showed a satisfactory agreement, which indicated that the proposed FEM model was reliable to use in conducting a parametric study on the shear performance of BSP beams. Considering the similarity, only the failure modes and load-deflection curves of the specimens Control and P3B2 are presented herein for simplicity (as shown in Figures 6 and 7); more details can be referred in to the literature of Li et al [32] presented herein for simplicity (as shown in Figures 6 and 7); more details can be referred in to the literature of Li et al [32] As is shown in Figure 7, the stiffness was characterized by the secant modulus Ke at the point P = 0.75 Pu (where Pu is the ultimate shear load), while δu was defined as maximum mid-span deflection corresponding to Pu and the modulus of toughness Ut (i.e., the area under the load-deflection curve) was adopted to quantify the amount of energy that the specimen absorbed in the whole loading process. The comparison between the experimental and numerical results (shown in Table 1) showed that the maximum errors of Pu and δu were 6.7% and 13.7%, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison Between Experimental and Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…literature of Li et al [32] As is shown in Figure 7, the stiffness was characterized by the secant modulus Ke at the point P = 0.75 Pu (where Pu is the ultimate shear load), while δu was defined as maximum mid-span deflection corresponding to Pu and the modulus of toughness Ut (i.e., the area under the load-deflection curve) was adopted to quantify the amount of energy that the specimen absorbed in the whole loading process. The comparison between the experimental and numerical results (shown in Table 1) showed that the maximum errors of Pu and δu were 6.7% and 13.7%, respectively.…”
Section: Diagonal Crackmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also known to have high stiffness. In general, the plates are bonded/glued to the beams and attached at the compression and tension zones of the RC beams to provide a locking mechanism that will increase the load-bearing capacity and ductility of the section in order to avoid brittle failure [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…External steel jacket anchored by bolts [3][4][5][6][7][8] was proved to be an effective way to enhance flexural strength and ductility of concrete members. However, the bolted steel plates were prone to fail in local buckling and thus cannot be introduced to the strengthening of masonry walls [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%