2003
DOI: 10.4133/jeeg8.2.133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulation of the Wave-Guide Effect of the Near-Surface Thin Layer on Radar Wave Propagation

Abstract: This paper assesses ground-penetrating radar (GPR) moveout survey performance in different near-surface geological stratigraphy and different antenna orientations using two-dimensional (2D) finite difference time domain (FDTD) numerical simulations of field data. We first treat the simple cases of radar pulses propagating along (a) the interface between two half-spaces (air/ice); and (b) an ice thinlayer wave-guide (air/ice/water) between two half-spaces. We then simulate four more complex cases combining two … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This change is likely a direct result of the signal reflection from the boundary between QS and the magnetite at a depth of 0.035 m. In addition, the signal characteristics are likely altered by the different propagation of the ground wave. The presence of the lowervelocity magnetite layer turns the overlying QS layer into a thin high-velocity waveguide (e.g., Liu and Arcone, 2003;Strobbia and Cassiani, 2007;van der Kruk et al, 2009).…”
Section: Magnetite Layer (Pd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change is likely a direct result of the signal reflection from the boundary between QS and the magnetite at a depth of 0.035 m. In addition, the signal characteristics are likely altered by the different propagation of the ground wave. The presence of the lowervelocity magnetite layer turns the overlying QS layer into a thin high-velocity waveguide (e.g., Liu and Arcone, 2003;Strobbia and Cassiani, 2007;van der Kruk et al, 2009).…”
Section: Magnetite Layer (Pd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several of these events may be highly dispersive, which has been treated [12][13][14], but only for horizontal layers. The dispersion is generated because the wedge is initially much less than an in situ wavelength in thickness, and it is complicated by thickness changes.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Modeling Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These interfacial solutions substantially differ from those for free space, as discussed by many authors [9][10][11]. Arcone [12] Arcone et al [13] and Liu and Arcone [14] treated the dispersive propagation caused by a thin layer with a 2-dimensional (2-D) finite difference time domain (FDTD) numerical model. Liu and Arcone [14] demonstrated how the near-surface stratigraphic structure plays an important role for different antenna polarization modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…HAN and WANG (2001) modeled the coupling of the elastic SH wave and the TE mode electric field by a fast finite-element time-domain method. This paper presents a numerical modeling scheme that models the fully coupled seismoelectric wave propagation using the pseudo-spectral time domain (PSTD) method (LIU, 1997, LIU andARCONE, 2003). We are particularly interested in the case of a seismic wave propagating through a porous medium with the presence of an externally exerted electric field, by the stimulation of observed results from a physical experiment conducted at a petroleum exploration site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%