2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2014.05.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of under-ventilated liquid-fueled compartment fires with flame extinction and thermally-driven fuel evaporation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Available models used to describe flame extinction in fire problems are based on the concepts of a critical flame temperature [1,2] or a critical flame Damköhler number [3][4][5][6][7]. Models based on the concept of a critical flame temperature choose to ignore the importance of chemical time scales and are not consistent with known laminar flame phenomenology [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Available models used to describe flame extinction in fire problems are based on the concepts of a critical flame temperature [1,2] or a critical flame Damköhler number [3][4][5][6][7]. Models based on the concept of a critical flame temperature choose to ignore the importance of chemical time scales and are not consistent with known laminar flame phenomenology [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models based on the concept of a critical flame Damköhler number explicitly or implicitly account for at least one chemical time scale, are consistent with known laminar flame phenomenology, and therefore may be expected to be more accurate [8]. The occurrence of flame extinction is also followed by that of reignition and the modeling of under-ventilated fires or fire suppression requires both an extinction model and a reignition model [4], a difficulty that is generally overlooked in the fire modeling literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an option is generally unavailable in fire applications which often include fuel sources that cannot be described with detailed reaction kinetics and complex configurations for which resolved heat transfer at the fuel source would require prohibitive computational cost. Despite these challenges, recent works have made notable progress in modeling and distinguishing ignition, extinction, and reignition processes in LES applications [1113]. …”
Section: Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third case, M3, follows conventions developed in recent affiliated works [1113], separating ignition and reignition using a tiered reaction mechanism. Including the primary reaction, R1, two additional reactions are introduced as Fuel+s AirFuel+s Air, Fuel+s Airfalse(1+sfalse) Products,where Fuel* is a secondary fuel species representing unburned fuel that has had the opportunity to react, but has been suppressed by Eq.…”
Section: Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simulate compartment fires, the computational codes used include Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS), FireFOAM, OpenFOAM, PHOENICS, FLUENT and CFX, among others (see, e.g., [7,10,[12][13][14][15][16][17]). All these codes have been extensively validated for a great variety of fire scenarios in the case of the first two and for a very large number of applications in the field of fluid mechanics in the case of the others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%