1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(97)00154-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of unsteady low-Reynolds number flow around rectangular cylinders at incidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
75
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
17
75
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting Cdmean and St are compared with the experimental data of Okajima 1 and Norberg. 2 Also these values are compared with the numerical results of Sohankar et al 3 and Gera et al 32 (see Table II). It can be observed that our results show good agreement with those of other researchers.…”
Section: B Code Validationmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resulting Cdmean and St are compared with the experimental data of Okajima 1 and Norberg. 2 Also these values are compared with the numerical results of Sohankar et al 3 and Gera et al 32 (see Table II). It can be observed that our results show good agreement with those of other researchers.…”
Section: B Code Validationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Also number of grid points, initial and boundary conditions change the flow behavior around bluff bodies. [1][2][3] Several analytic and numerical studies have been conducted to study the characteristics of Newtonian as well as non-Newtonian fluid flows. [4][5][6] Also numerous experimental and numerical studies have been carried out for the flow past inline circular cylinders; some representative works are those of Zdravkovich, 7 Williamson, 8 Mizushima and Suehiro, 9 Sumner et al, 10 and Lam et al 11 These researchers found that the gap spacing between cylinders play an important role because it strongly affects the flow patterns and also flow induced forces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2,15]. Previous works by the present authors [25,26,27,28] have shown that the RMS lift and drag coefficients are more sensitive than mean values to various numerical and physical parameters. The experimental and numerical results in Table 1 confirm this finding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Kelkar and Patankar (1992) via flow stability analysis, found that the critical Reynolds number for the onset of vortex shedding was 54, which is in line with the results obtained and presented in figure 3. For unconfined flow past a square cylinder in an unsteady periodic flow regime under the Reynolds number range 100≤Re≤200, average drag coefficients and Strouhal numbers were compared with the results presented by Franke et al (1990) and Sohankar et al (1997;1998;. In all cases identical flow and boundary conditions were used.…”
Section: Numerical Strategy and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%