2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of wake vortices of crop spraying aircraft close to the ground

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this kind of fixed-wing airflow does not belong to downwash, ground-effect and droplet distribution were analysed based on it, which is very close to the approach of downwash examination. One published work by Zhang from Northwestern Polytechnical University in China and Tang from National Research Centre of Intelligent Equipment for Agriculture investigated the distribution of wake vortexes of a monoplane, Thrush 510G, identifying that the starboard vortex existed longer than the port one [61] . Ultrasonic anemometers were employed to acquire the airflow velocity during the aircraft passing by.…”
Section: Examination By Using Cfdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this kind of fixed-wing airflow does not belong to downwash, ground-effect and droplet distribution were analysed based on it, which is very close to the approach of downwash examination. One published work by Zhang from Northwestern Polytechnical University in China and Tang from National Research Centre of Intelligent Equipment for Agriculture investigated the distribution of wake vortexes of a monoplane, Thrush 510G, identifying that the starboard vortex existed longer than the port one [61] . Ultrasonic anemometers were employed to acquire the airflow velocity during the aircraft passing by.…”
Section: Examination By Using Cfdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Figure 6, the high mass concentration were located at 50 m to 100 m at the central of the plume and reduced as the droplets transported downstream positions at 250 m as the droplets dispersed outwards. Results showed that for a released height of 4.7 meter, the particle mass concentration had the lowest concentration which is 39% reduced from 0.1963 g/m 3 compare to 0.2743 g/m 3 for a released height of 3.7 m.These findings showed the same result explained by Ryan et.al [4] that at lowest spray released height, smaller droplets were formed and scattered outwards at quicker rates but less contribution in droplets volume compared to higher released height. Since uniformity spray distribution was the main aim of this simulation, it is suggested that aerial spraying at low released height ensuring that the particles trajectories is sufficient to reach the intended targets before drift occurs due to the initial airspeed as mentioned in the earlier studies by Dorr et.al [2] .…”
Section: Spray Coveragementioning
confidence: 96%
“…The sprayed deposition pattern is critical in aerial spraying works, illustrated the effects of aerial spraying works with optimum distance ranging not less than 2.4 m above the crop or ground compare to forestry application which is 6 m or higher. The turbulent dispersion, subjected to change and continue falling in effect of gravity magnitude which coincides at the end of the injection of the spray plume as proposed by Zhang et.al [3]. Generally, it was found that the maximum sprayed deposition area was achieved at the highest released height of 4.7 m compared for a released height of 3.7 m. Thus, a good combination of spray released height with low airspeed is significantly affected the aerial spraying deposition pattern.…”
Section: Spray Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations