2020
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.191383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation on fracturing behaviour of hard roofs at different levels during extra-thick coal seam mining

Abstract: In fully mechanized caving mining of extra-thick coal seams, the movement range of overburden is wide, resulting in the breakage of multilayer hard roofs in overlying large spaces. However, the characteristics, morphology and impact effect of hard roofs at different levels are different and unclear. In this study, a secondary development was used in the numerical simulation software ABAQUS, and the caving of rock strata in the finite-element software was realized. The bearing stress distribution, fracturing mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the 150202 tailgate is excavated in a thick coal seam, the immediate floor and two ribs are composed of coal, the immediate roof is composed of mudstone, and the main roof is composed of limestone. Therefore, as the LTCC mining face advances, the stress release caused by the overhanging roof of the limestone will cause a significant floor heave and rib collapse (Gao et al, 2020; Verma and Singh, 2009), as shown in Figure 4(a) and (b).…”
Section: Case Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 150202 tailgate is excavated in a thick coal seam, the immediate floor and two ribs are composed of coal, the immediate roof is composed of mudstone, and the main roof is composed of limestone. Therefore, as the LTCC mining face advances, the stress release caused by the overhanging roof of the limestone will cause a significant floor heave and rib collapse (Gao et al, 2020; Verma and Singh, 2009), as shown in Figure 4(a) and (b).…”
Section: Case Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frame size of the physical model in the laboratory was 2:5 × 0:2 × 1:9 m (length × width × height). The geometric similitude ratio of the designed model was 150 : 1; the actual height of the model was 1.47 m, which simulated a height of 220 m. Materials including sand, calcium carbonate, and gypsum were used Table 3 shows the physical and mechanical parameters of the coal and rock mass [31]. According to the similarity ratio, the matching parameters of each rock formation in the model are shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Basic Parameters Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lu et al used the secondary developed FLAC3D simulation software to determine the target layer of surface fracturing [37]. Gao et al used the physical model and ABAQUS to research the characteristics of the overburden displacement and strata breaking strength after the vertical crack and horizontal crack existed in the high-level hard roof [38][39][40]. Based on the self-bearing of bulking rocks, the stability principle of the surrounding rock, and energy dissipation theories, Pan et al obtained the criteria for determining the fracturing horizon and thickness of the HHR [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%