2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation study of a tree windbreak

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 and 2) resulted in smaller protected zone. The result agrees with Fryrear and Skidmore (1985); Van den Steen (1995), Bitog et al (2012) that the higher the windward wind velocity, the smaller the protected horizontal distance until the velocity had almost recovered.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 and 2) resulted in smaller protected zone. The result agrees with Fryrear and Skidmore (1985); Van den Steen (1995), Bitog et al (2012) that the higher the windward wind velocity, the smaller the protected horizontal distance until the velocity had almost recovered.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…An analysis of optical porosity of the windbreak allows assessing its effect in different phonological phases (Středová et al 2012). Unfortunately, the porosity for trees is very complex to deal with and very difficult to determine due to the irregular size and shape of the trees and varied distribution of the pores (Zhu et al 2003;Dong et al 2006;Bitog et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulations revealed that 0.5 m gap between trees were more effective in reducing wind velocity, figure (12). Two-rows of alternating trees were also found to be more effective than one-row and two-rows of trees as shown in figure 13 (Bitog et al 2012). …”
Section: Windbreaksmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…3). Based on previous experiments and observations in similar urban contexts by Westerberg and Glaumann (1990–1991), Bitog et al (2012), and Lenzhölzer, (2010), the trees were placed perpendicular to the wind flow in a single‐row shelterbelt. The purpose of placing a single row of trees was to examine how different species may influence the lee cavity in the courtyard area depending on their porosity (Oke, 1988; Lenzhölzer, 2010; Santamouris, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%