2022
DOI: 10.1007/s42496-022-00141-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulations of Fuel Shape Change and Swirling Flows in Paraffin/Oxygen Hybrid Rocket Engines

Abstract: The objective of this work is to describe and validate a numerical axisymmetric approach for the simulation of hybrid rocket engines (HREs), based on Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations, with sub-models for fluid–surface interaction, radiation, chemistry, and turbulence. Fuel grain consumption is considered on both radial and axial directions and both axial and swirl injection of the oxidizer are simulated. Firing tests of two different paraffin–oxygen hybrid rockets are considered. First, a numerical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it can be argued whether Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes approaches (as in the majority of HRE simulations) are ideally suited for the complex wall blowing and pyrolysing phenomena at the fuel surface. Nevertheless, numerical simulations of HREs are improving significantly, be it in the modelling of hydrodynamic instabilities [149,150], swirl injection [138,[152][153][154], shape changing simulations [153][154][155][156][157] (see Figures 7 and 8), complex geometries such as helices [158][159][160], rotated grains [144,161], throttling [72,162], or nozzle erosion [94,163]. Simplified geometries and simulations carried out on the average fuel port diameter are considerably less computationally costly compared to multiple instances of the fuel port progression, with both providing satisfactory representations of the HRE flow field and local regression rates [157,164].…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it can be argued whether Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes approaches (as in the majority of HRE simulations) are ideally suited for the complex wall blowing and pyrolysing phenomena at the fuel surface. Nevertheless, numerical simulations of HREs are improving significantly, be it in the modelling of hydrodynamic instabilities [149,150], swirl injection [138,[152][153][154], shape changing simulations [153][154][155][156][157] (see Figures 7 and 8), complex geometries such as helices [158][159][160], rotated grains [144,161], throttling [72,162], or nozzle erosion [94,163]. Simplified geometries and simulations carried out on the average fuel port diameter are considerably less computationally costly compared to multiple instances of the fuel port progression, with both providing satisfactory representations of the HRE flow field and local regression rates [157,164].…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, HREs have simpler structures than liquid rocket engines [2][3][4][5]. However, the development of HREs is currently confined by the low fuel grain regression rates associated with these engines [6][7][8][9] along with the uneven distribution of regression along the fuel grain. These issues occur because the combustion process in an HRE is primarily driven by boundary-layer fluid dynamics [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%