2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00419-008-0237-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulations of gas–liquid–solid flows in a hydrocyclone separator

Abstract: The flow behavior in hydrocyclones is quite complex. In this study, the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method was used to simulate the flow fields inside a hydrocyclone in order to investigate its separation efficiency. In the computational fluid dynamics study of hydrocyclones, the air-core dimension is a key to predicting the mass split between the underflow and overflow. In turn, the mass split influences the prediction of the size classification curve. Three models, the k − ε model, the Reynolds stress… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to deal with the coupling of velocity and pressure, the well-known SIMPLE (Semi-Implicit Method for Pressure-Linked Equations) strategy was used due to the reasonable accuracy and relative low calculation cost [32]. The PRESTO (pressure staggered option), a pressure interpolation scheme that is beneficial for predicting the highly swirling flow characteristics prevailing inside the fluidic amplifier, was adopted [33]. As the dynamic mesh method only works with the first-order time advancement at present, the first-order upwind scheme was employed for the discretization [34].…”
Section: Boundary Conditions and Solving Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to deal with the coupling of velocity and pressure, the well-known SIMPLE (Semi-Implicit Method for Pressure-Linked Equations) strategy was used due to the reasonable accuracy and relative low calculation cost [32]. The PRESTO (pressure staggered option), a pressure interpolation scheme that is beneficial for predicting the highly swirling flow characteristics prevailing inside the fluidic amplifier, was adopted [33]. As the dynamic mesh method only works with the first-order time advancement at present, the first-order upwind scheme was employed for the discretization [34].…”
Section: Boundary Conditions and Solving Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mesh densities of 1,500,000, 1,100,000 and 950,000 cells are optimal for good predictions and reasonable computational time for simulations in the LES, RSM and RNG k-ε, respectively. Further details of the mesh scheme, k-ε and RSM simulation condition, and laboratory model has been discussed in the previous work [16]. In the LES model, the same mesh schemes and operational condition as in the RNG k-ε and RSM were applied.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is a simple and efficient formulation designed to track the interface of two phases that do not interpenetrate with a relatively small number of interfaces. Hence it is often used to simulate the gas-liquid multiphase flow in industrial devices (Brennan, 2003;Brennan et al, 2007;Li et al, 1999;Mousavian & Najafi, 2009). VOF introduces a variable  which takes values from zero to one and represents the volume fraction of one of the phases in each cell.…”
Section: Two-phase Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%