2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2003.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulations of Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instability using MAH-3 code

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Smaller wavelengths grow faster than longer wavelengths, so longer wavelength perturbations are less likely to become nonlinear. In these models, as well as the single instability investigated in Anuchina et al (2004), the RT fingers did not interact with one another, ensuring that the relative drag on the fingers was the only significant difference between 2D and 3D. This accounts for the around 30% faster growth rates discovered in these simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Smaller wavelengths grow faster than longer wavelengths, so longer wavelength perturbations are less likely to become nonlinear. In these models, as well as the single instability investigated in Anuchina et al (2004), the RT fingers did not interact with one another, ensuring that the relative drag on the fingers was the only significant difference between 2D and 3D. This accounts for the around 30% faster growth rates discovered in these simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This was found in a laboratory context in the simulations of Miles et al (2005). For simulations in which interactions between the RT fingers do not occur, either because only one finger is modeled (Anuchina et al 2004) or the RT fingers grow for a short enough time that they never interact (Kane et al 2000), the greater effective drag experienced in 2D versus 3D will continue to dominate the simulation, ensuring that the width of the mixed region will be larger in 3D than in 2D. For simulations in which the RT instability has enough time to grow that the fingers begin to interact with one another, the width of the mixed region will be the same in 2D and 3D simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The behavior of RM instability has been isolated and studied by many authors (e.g., [63,[71][72][73]). The numerical study of RM instability by Anuchina et al [74] showed that the growth rate of perturbations in a 3D case was higher than that in a 2D case at the identical initial amplitudes of perturbation and wavelengths. Li and Zhang [73] used both theoretical analysis and high-resolution numerical simulation to compare 2-D and 3-D growth rates of the RM instability.…”
Section: Three-dimensional Effectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They observe that the effective Atwood number changes owing to the mixing and defined an effective, time-varying Atwood number that collapses previous numerical and experimental data on the mixing layer growth rate. In reference [86], both single-and multi-mode RTI 120 3 simulations are reported with the MAH-3 code. The development of the kinetic energy spectrum is discussed in connection to the onset of self-similarity in the layer growth.…”
Section: (I) Direct Numerical Simulations Of Rayleigh-taylor Instabilmentioning
confidence: 99%