2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2014.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulations of separated flows at moderate Reynolds numbers appropriate for turbine blades and unmanned aero vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In cases of relaminarization in transitional flows, the predictions are often inconveniently sensitive to model parameter selection. More recently, the detailed effect of numerical dissipation in immersed boundary/LES methods has been examined in [30,31]. The numerical dissipation may exceed viscous or sub-grid scale model dissipation in transitional flows with laminar separation bubbles, so turbulence quantities and dissipation rates may agree with other computations or experiment only after suitable tuning of model coefficients.…”
Section: The Naca 0012 As a Standard Test Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases of relaminarization in transitional flows, the predictions are often inconveniently sensitive to model parameter selection. More recently, the detailed effect of numerical dissipation in immersed boundary/LES methods has been examined in [30,31]. The numerical dissipation may exceed viscous or sub-grid scale model dissipation in transitional flows with laminar separation bubbles, so turbulence quantities and dissipation rates may agree with other computations or experiment only after suitable tuning of model coefficients.…”
Section: The Naca 0012 As a Standard Test Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, for this particular flow configuration, it seems that the excess of numerical dissipation, with respect to the sub-grid-scale dissipation, is not enough to be appreciable in the chosen metrics (Pressure and skin friction coefficients, separation and reattachment points). These findings also explain why there is a negligible difference in the results when an explicit LES model is added (see Figure 2) (Castiglioni et al, 2014). The numerical dissipation is dominant over the SGS dissipation, therefore adding an explicit model does not improve the results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The application of the method to this specific simulation enabled the quantification of previously reported qualitative findings (Castiglioni et al, 2014). Two important observations have been quantified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent publications have demonstrated that the IB method is able to accurately reproduce the flow around airfoils even at medium-tolarge Reynolds numbers whenever adequately fine fluid meshes are adopted. Castiglioni et al [21] performed a LES of a NACA 0012 with a fixed angle of attack at Re c ¼ 5 Â 10 4 and achieved good agreement of aerodynamic coefficients computed with the IB method compared with those obtained from body-fitted model simulations. Tay et al [22] studied different IB methods for the simulation of flapping wings and showed, when comparing the results to experimental measurements, that the accuracy of their IB model is similar to that of a body-fitted model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%