2020
DOI: 10.2514/1.t5882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulations of Shock Propagation Under Strong Nonequilibrium Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exception may be if an advanced optical technique such as tuneable diode laser absorption spectroscopy [4] or coherent anti-stokes Raman spectroscopy [5] is used, but these techniques are complex, difficult to set up and generally cannot be done simultaneously with the experiments, which means an individual freestream estimate for each shot cannot be obtained. Full-facility time-accurate Navier-Stokes simulations are sometimes used to characterize these test conditions [6][7][8]; however, an obvious disadvantage is that an individual calibration for each run is impractical due to the computational time required. This is unless a perfectly steady flow is assumed and only the nozzle flow is simulated to ease the computational burden [9,10], in which case the result would not be time-resolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exception may be if an advanced optical technique such as tuneable diode laser absorption spectroscopy [4] or coherent anti-stokes Raman spectroscopy [5] is used, but these techniques are complex, difficult to set up and generally cannot be done simultaneously with the experiments, which means an individual freestream estimate for each shot cannot be obtained. Full-facility time-accurate Navier-Stokes simulations are sometimes used to characterize these test conditions [6][7][8]; however, an obvious disadvantage is that an individual calibration for each run is impractical due to the computational time required. This is unless a perfectly steady flow is assumed and only the nozzle flow is simulated to ease the computational burden [9,10], in which case the result would not be time-resolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%